<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3-D Mania: Awesome or a waste of time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lizzbryce.com/2010/01/30/3-d-mania-awesome-or-a-waste-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lizzbryce.com/2010/01/30/3-d-mania-awesome-or-a-waste-of-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Luck, Sandy. &#171; Lizz Bryce</title>
		<link>http://lizzbryce.com/2010/01/30/3-d-mania-awesome-or-a-waste-of-time/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Good Luck, Sandy. &#171; Lizz Bryce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizzbryce.com/?p=362#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] An Education.  But her movie couldn&#8217;t compete with all the hype this year. With Bigelow and Cameron&#8217;s imaginary fight, and all the awards hype surrounding Precious, she really didn&#8217;t have a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Education.  But her movie couldn&#8217;t compete with all the hype this year. With Bigelow and Cameron&#8217;s imaginary fight, and all the awards hype surrounding Precious, she really didn&#8217;t have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://lizzbryce.com/2010/01/30/3-d-mania-awesome-or-a-waste-of-time/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizzbryce.com/?p=362#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think 3-D is bar none a gimmick.  What happens when these flicks go to BluRay - I&#039;ve seen My Bloody Valentine in theatres and on my HD Screen...it doesn&#039;t work the same way.  In theatres it was terrific, but once it gets to home video, the appeal is toast.

I find 3-D absolutely unnecessary and actually dulls the colours that I intended to be dazzled by in Avatar.  And although I did not like the film (and continue to like it less and less as it&#039;s popularity grows [seriously people, wtf - the characters sucked]) I would have loved to see High Res colours on a digital screen - but no, I got to see a 3-D version of Pandura.  Blow me.

I&#039;ll see any horror film in 3-D (with the exception of another Saw flick [again, wtf people]) because I know there&#039;s a point to the 3-D.

Great post Lizz, keep writing and thanks so much for this topic!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 3-D is bar none a gimmick.  What happens when these flicks go to BluRay &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen My Bloody Valentine in theatres and on my HD Screen&#8230;it doesn&#8217;t work the same way.  In theatres it was terrific, but once it gets to home video, the appeal is toast.</p>
<p>I find 3-D absolutely unnecessary and actually dulls the colours that I intended to be dazzled by in Avatar.  And although I did not like the film (and continue to like it less and less as it&#8217;s popularity grows [seriously people, wtf - the characters sucked]) I would have loved to see High Res colours on a digital screen &#8211; but no, I got to see a 3-D version of Pandura.  Blow me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll see any horror film in 3-D (with the exception of another Saw flick [again, wtf people]) because I know there&#8217;s a point to the 3-D.</p>
<p>Great post Lizz, keep writing and thanks so much for this topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizz</title>
		<link>http://lizzbryce.com/2010/01/30/3-d-mania-awesome-or-a-waste-of-time/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizzbryce.com/?p=362#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you watch the Grammy&#039;s? Here&#039;s a great example of 3-D overdose: http://laineygossip.com/Grammy_Awards_2010_wrap_up_01feb10.aspx?CatID=0&amp;CelID=0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you watch the Grammy&#8217;s? Here&#8217;s a great example of 3-D overdose: <a href="http://laineygossip.com/Grammy_Awards_2010_wrap_up_01feb10.aspx?CatID=0&#038;CelID=0" rel="nofollow">http://laineygossip.com/Grammy_Awards_2010_wrap_up_01feb10.aspx?CatID=0&#038;CelID=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://lizzbryce.com/2010/01/30/3-d-mania-awesome-or-a-waste-of-time/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizzbryce.com/?p=362#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see your point, and I&#039;m not convinced that I would have been missing a great experience if they hadn&#039;t been in 3D... But at the same time, I suspect people said the same thing about colour. Or talkies. 

As you say, the studios could invest the money in &quot;technology to keep movies evolving&quot;... but perhaps 3D IS that technology. Not the final product, but a step along the way. If you compare Coraline to Up to Avatar, the technology has been used more effectively, more naturalistically, to add to the films; maybe the next step, or the one after that, gets it all right. 

Or maybe you just get another Amityville 3D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point, and I&#8217;m not convinced that I would have been missing a great experience if they hadn&#8217;t been in 3D&#8230; But at the same time, I suspect people said the same thing about colour. Or talkies. </p>
<p>As you say, the studios could invest the money in &#8220;technology to keep movies evolving&#8221;&#8230; but perhaps 3D IS that technology. Not the final product, but a step along the way. If you compare Coraline to Up to Avatar, the technology has been used more effectively, more naturalistically, to add to the films; maybe the next step, or the one after that, gets it all right. </p>
<p>Or maybe you just get another Amityville 3D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

