RSS Feed

Slutwalk 2011: If she’s a slut, I’m one too

Posted on
http://instagr.am/p/Czg2Q/

SlutWalk Toronto protest sign via @calamityjennnnn

Slutwalk Toronto, a march down the streets of Toronto to protest the shaming women based on their appearance and their choices, and blaming women for sexual assaults (check out the list of other cities participating), happened today.

Let me start by saying that I am not an authority on this event, and probably not even the best person to be explaining it. But since it came up at a dinner that included strangers last night, and I feel like I did a poor job of explaining it (I write instead of talk for a reason), I’m going to give it another shot here. You can visit the official site here, follow the twitter feed here, or follow the conversation on Twitter here.

There were some ignorant questions asked at this dinner. Mainly “Does everyone dress like sluts?” Ignorant, of course, because that suggests that a) being a slut is a real thing and not an unfairly applied term used in an effort to shame women,  and  b) links appearance to promiscuity (and with that the understanding of what “promiscuity” is), and promiscuity to deservedness (of assault or disrespect).

But the more important question, asked this time from a woman, was “Why not call it a ‘Women’s Empowerment Walk’ instead of ‘Slutwalk’?”  I think she was coming from a good place.  Why would you want to label yourself with a word that is so offensive?  Why would you protest using a word that continues to be used to discredit women?
I tried to respond, but I didn’t have a very good answer. I guess because I hadn’t thought it through very well.  I think I’ve figured it out now.

Calling it “Slut” walk is not, as far as I can tell, a re-appropriation of the word “slut,” as much as it is a denouncement of those who use the word to define women – any women.

Slut is a name unfairly given to women based on what one person, or a society as a whole, perceives them to be.  The label comes with a basket of assumptions about actions and choices, and is deliberately used to shame (even by those who attempt to re-appropriate it – see: my friends circa 2002).  It’s used to other these women, to separate them from the good and deserving women of society.  It implies that these women are less worthy of respect and protection.   It’s an excuse for hurting them and for defending the men who do the hurting.

By separating the “us” from “the sluts” we create a false sense of security.  Even though we’re collectively outraged by a judge and a police officer who come right out and victim blame/slut shame, there are many among us who harbour the same biases against women.  So by calling it Slutwalk, and participating in Slutwalk*, it effectively sends a message that “if she’s a slut, so am I.”  Because “sluts” aren’t real.

So why does it matter if women are called sluts?

I guess it’s a bit like why rape jokes aren’t funny.  Because even if you’re a totally nice guy who wouldn’t actually ever rape someone, there’s a good chance that someone around you thinks you’re serious and that you actually do think rape is okay. (this is a paraphrased idea from Kate Harding and others, but I couldn’t find the right link).  Making rape jokes and using derogatory language like “slut” contributes to our rape culture, and whether you mean to or not, you’re holding up a social norm that says that rape is ok as long as it only happens to bad women.

Slutwalk Toronto Protest sign via @CalamityJennnnn

Until we can get to a point where we don’t think only some women deserve a life free from violence, until we stop thinking that anyone is EVER asking to be hurt, and until we stop defending men who hurt women (whether it is because we like those men/their work, or because we don’t like the women) then we will not stop sexual assault from happening.

Until we stop dividing women into groups, and valuing them based on their perceived purity, actions or sexuality, we will not stop rape from happening.

Until we stop othering women who do not fit into a socially constructed idea of proper (usually white), pure, womanhood  (e.g. “sluts,” sex workers, women of colour, women in developing nations, women who wear short skirts or who go to parties, women who drink, women who use drugs, women who accept rides with strangers or those who accept rides with friends, women who go home with someone at a bar, women who don’t protect themselves from rape in a way that we think they should, etc. etc etc), rape will continue to happen.

So here’s to those women who were brave enough to stand up and say “We aren’t ever asking for it!” and to all the women who continue to fight for a world free of violence.

*I wasn’t part of the march.  I’m not a girl who likes crowds

Update: You should also read this fabulous post on Feministing. “What might appear slutty to one person might appear totally unremarkable to another. In other words, Fagan doesn’t get to define “slutty.” No one gets to define “slutty,” because “slutty” is entirely relative. Which is especially handy for people who want to blame a woman for her own rape, since the “slut” label can be slapped on pretty much any woman, anywhere, at any time!”

The Best of Vegas…as evaluated by Lizz

Posted on

Vegas is a strange place.  Just like everyone told me before I left for my trip last summer, it’s like no place you’ve ever seen before.

As the plane landed on the runway only a few km from the strip, I looked out the window to identify the green monstrosity that was my hotel.  Palm trees and desert formed a superficial barrier between my airplane and “Vegas” – the town of sin and romance, of showgirls and Sinatra (now Celine Dion), of wealth and bankruptcy.

As I stepped into the airport, I was surrounded by slot machines, but fewer people than I had anticipated (it was a Wednesday after all).

We were quickly herded into a tram to take us to the other terminal, and then from there into a cab to take us to The Strip.  Our driver was friendly and the roads, while constructed only for fast moving cars on 14 lanes, were empty and efficiently planned.

When we arrived at the MGM Grand, the lobby was attractive, but not overwhelming – the size of the hotel wouldn’t hit me until later when I tried to get across it.  Our check-in was swift and we were sent up to our room despite check-in not being officially available for another 3 hours.

Our room was like any other hotel room – two beds, a desk, a tv in an ugly armoir, and a slightly above average bathroom.  But when I looked out the window I knew I was in the Vegas that people had told me about. I opened my curtains for a head-on view of the New York skyline.  Well, sort of.NewYork New York Hotel Vegas Author Kris1123 on Wikimedia Commons

All the highlights were there: the Empire State building, the Statue of Liberty, and the Chrysler Building. Yet, as tacky as a replica of New York City should be, it wasn’t. It was cool.

I felt the same about the replica Eiffel Tower and Arc de Triomphe at the Paris, and the canals of “Venice”.  It really felt as if I were walking through the streets of Paris and Rome – as long as I didn’t look up at the painted blue sky.

It surprised me how untacky Vegas turned out to be.  Sure, walking through Harrah’s casino with a thick cloud of smoke, low ceilings and garish slot machines still made my skin crawl, but it was almost welcome .  That small amount of tackyness next to dozens of billion dollar pseudo-European landmarks made me feel grounded – like Vegas might be a real place, albeit a strange one.

Best of Vegas

If you’re in to pure gluttony, head for the buffets. Harrah’s Buffet of Buffets (which includes Harrah’s, Imperial Palace, Planet Hollywood, Paris, Caesar’s Palace, The Rio and The Flamingo) is a 24-hour, all-you-can-eat smorgasbord of gluttony.  Nothing says Vegas like 3 plates full of carbs and room for dessert. Price: $44.95

We ate at the Paris, Caesar’s Palace and Planet Hollywood.  I would definitely recommend the first two – the food was good, but the line at Paris was huge (something about the age of the crowd that stays there it seemed), and the employee’s at Caesar’s were rather curt.  But in both cases I felt like I enjoyed my food and the atmosphere.  Planet Hollywood, on the other hand, felt like eating at a food court.  The food was stale and uninspired.  And though there were more choices than any other buffet, I ended up wasting a huge amount of food because it just wasn’t any good.  Of course don’t expect gourmet (Vegas has great restaurants if you’re willing to spend the money), but if what you’re looking for is a lot of food for not a lot of money, the buffets will rock your world.  The caveat, of course, is that Vegas is incredibly difficult to navigate quickly.  If you’re not staying at one of those 7 hotels, keep in mind that you’ll need to factor in travel time. Whether you’re taking the monorail, a cab, or walking, traveling through the gigantic hotels or through the jam-packed streets, it will take time.

But if you’re not as concerned about price (but still love the gluttony), the Treasure Island buffet was by far the best.  The food, though not extremely varied, was really good.  It was hot, tasted fresh, and delicious.

I’d also recommend the Premium Outlet Mall on the north side of the strip.   I had been warned before I went that the prices weren’t very good and that I should consider driving out of town to the other mall, but it just wasn’t an option.  It didn’t matter anyhow. I found a great Ann Taylor dress for 60% off, and a Coach purse for 70% off.  To get there, we took the monorail to the end of the line, and then hopped a city bus. It was a long ride, but worth saving $40 on a cab and gave us a glimpse (though not a great one) of Vegas off The Strip. You can find alternate transportation options here.

The worst of Vegas

Family of Pimps: I had no expectation of Las Vegas as a classy town.  Peep shows, strip clubs, and burlesque.  I get it.  But where I really got skeeved out was with the string of pimps that lined the sidewalks of the strip, virtually shoulder to shoulder.  They were old and young, men and women.  With a swift flick of the wrist and a t-shirt promising delivery of girls within 20 minutes, the people shoved “business” cards in the hands/faces of every man (and some women) who passed by.  I couldn’t help thinking “who are these girls?” and “where are they from?” “Why are they available on demand and do they want to be there?”  It was dirty, and creepy, and likely a little human trafficking.  I could be wrong, but I don’t really believe that I am.

Travel time: It takes so long to get anywhere.  It’s not  just that it is crowded and difficult to walk on the sidewalk (though it would be nice if anyone would move faster than a toddler) it’s that all the buildings are so immense, the monorail is so far off the strip, and the parking lots take up so much room that nothing is as close as it appears.  It took us 20 minutes to get from the monorail in our hotel, to another hotel that we could see was diagonally across the street.  When we were trying to get to a show at Mandalay Bay from the monorail at MGM, we had to first sprint across the hotel – through the casino, past the lions, up the stairs and over the bridge.  Then we travelled through the New York, New York, over a second bridge and into Excalibur hotel.  Then we hopped a tram, and crossed the final hotel to get to the theatre.  It was exhausting.

I have no doubt that I got a lot of exercise in Vegas, but it wasn’t enjoyable like walking through the streets and looking at sites, it was spent navigating crowds in smoky casinos just to get to the next place.  As I mentioned before, this is why the Buffet of Buffets was a problem.  Since we weren’t staying at the hotels with the buffets, we had to travel thirty minutes in each direction to get a meal.  We ended up only doing it once and then switched to eating at Denny’s and the Food Court of our hotel.

Kids: This is going to get me in trouble, so let me explain.  There were a lot of kids on the strip (at my hotel, in the pool, at the shows).  But they don’t belong there.  Vegas is, as many people have described it to me, Disney Land for adults.  It’s gambling, drinking and sex.  Though you can surely make it what you want it to be (I’m fairly lame as far as mid-twenties girls go), what you can’t make it is wholesome.  As we lazed in our pool at the MGM (which is fantastic, by the way), I watched kids splashing around, surrounded by drunk people and floating beer cans.  It was gross, and it made me feel guilty (and protective).  It messed with my fun.  At the Treasure Island pirate show, kids waited eagerly to see girls in booty shorts sing about sex.

Sure, we might have different definitions of wholesome (or whether “wholesome” is a good goal anyway) but kids in Vegas is weird.  There’s little for them to enjoy, and they cramped my style.

 

The Kids are All Right: A Review

Posted on

Sometimes movies have really great beginnings. They draw you in with a captivating story, good action, or even just some charming characters. Then they go to shit.The Kids are All Right Movie Poster

Other movies start out so bad that you often don’t even make it to the end – even though occasionally things improve.

The Kids are All Right fits into the second category.

Luckily, because I’m too cheap to walk out on $13.50, I stayed for the entirety. Despite starting out miserably, the film gets a lot better as it goes on.

The dramedy is loosely about a lesbian couple happily raising their children when the pesky sperm donor shows up.

For the first half of the movie, all I could think of is how uncomfortable I was with everything happening on screen. Nic (Annette Benning) and Jules (Julianne Moore) are over the top and kind of creepy. While both are brilliant actors, they had little chemistry as a couple which makes their interactions and displays of affection feel contrived.

In the scene where the two are watching gay male porn and the volume gets turned up, I felt uncomfortable not because of the content, but because it had taken their only sex scene and turned it into lazy joke.  It didn’t come across as a “we’ve been together so long our sex lives have fallen apart,” it was just hard to watch.

What’s more, both Benning and Moore’s characters were thoroughly unlikable for much of the movie – Nic is an insufferable control freak, and Jules is her flaky, flower child opposite.

Luckily, things get better when Mark Ruffalo enters the picture – not so much because he had a great character or displayed his best acting chops, but because his character gave Nic and Jules’ relationship troubles some grounding.  Jules’ affair was what brought out flaws in Jules (who previously appeared to just not live up to Nic’s unreachable standards) and brought out humanity in Nic.

Despite the title, the movie really isn’t about the kids (which is too bad because Mia Wasikowska is a fantastic actor).  It’s about marriage. That’s why the the last 45 minutes were so good. It was raw, more real. Nic stopped being  such a shrew and became relatable.  Jules’ became a serious character, and delivered a speech (though obvious) that resonated with everyone in the audience

It wasn’t a great movie (don’t even get me started on the Oscar nonsense), but sometimes we just need a movie to reflect how we feel about life.

So if you’ve ever realized how hard a relationship is AND you have nothing to do and want to watch a movie for free on TMN, give this one a shot.

Rape, Reporters, and Women

Posted on

Note: I wrote this after news of  CBS correspondent Lara Logan’s brutal assault surfaced, when amongst all the victim blaming, people had the nerve to ask ‘Should women reporters be allowed to report from war zones?’ I forgot to post it, but nothing’s changed since then

Asking what it means to be a women in a conflict zone suggests that it is the woman’s responsibility to protect herself from assault.  Asking if it’s appropriate for a woman to be there might as well as be asking if it is appropriate for women to be anywhere.

Even if women could prevent assaults just by taking precautions, the responsibility should never lie with her.  Rape is the responsibility of the men who commit it. Sexual Assault doesn’t ever come with the job.

International Women’s Day: Why feminsim isn’t passé

Posted on

Susan B. Anthony (LOC)
I don’t know what I take the bait every time and read Margaret Wente’s nonsense. But I did. And it was as poorly thought out, under-researched, offensive, and so full of ass-hattery that I have been sucked into replying.

I will not, however, link to the article. If you haven’t read it, I leave it up to you if you want to contribute page views (and therefore money). But I’ll keep it short. Two reasons why Wente has done a disservice to women everywhere with “In the West, the war for women’s rights is over, and we won”

When Margaret Wente used the outrage at Justice Robert Dewar as proof that the west no longer needs International Women’s Day, she forgot two things:
1) We still live in a culture where rape happens (and clearly at least one, but we all know it is more) person blames women for letting it happen . Until there is no rape, we need feminism
2) International Women’s Day is about women everywhere (it’s in the name, Margaret). Even if I believed there was nothing left to be done in the west, there is still plenty of work to be done for the status of women in the world.
Pro-abortusdemonstratie / Pro abortion demonstration

I’m a feminist and International Women’s Day matters to me.

If you need more convincing, visit Shameless Magazine’s blog for a good ‘ole fashioned list of bad things that still happen to women.

No autotune here

Posted on

When a live performance sounds just like the album, be impressed.

Final guest post on Sweetspot.ca

Posted on

My final guest blogger post is up at Sweetspot.ca. Have a read: The Real Experts

Gifts for a sick girl

Posted on

My boss’s daughter drew this for me today because I am sick.  I dig it.

New Sweetmama Post – Week 3

Posted on

I’m back again! Talking babysitting and serial killers on Sweetspot.ca (plus bad puns)

Read it here: Perks, Courtesies and Common Cents

In Defense of Valentine’s Day

Posted on

People sure like to hate on Valentine’s Day.

While I thought it was weird that the cashier at the Vancouver airport on February 11th wished me a “Happy Valentine’s Day” as if it were a real holiday, I don’t quite get all the whinging.

So it’s a cheesy, commercialized day that forces feelings (or hope of feelings) upon us that we don’t necessarily feel.  Doesn’t every holiday?  Thanksgiving dictates that we feel thankful, Christmas urges us to love our families (and maybe our Lord, Easter has been completely co-opted by the bunny industry (or Cadbury…).  Mothers’ and Fathers’ Day (and Secretaries’ and Space-Cowboys days…) were created the same way, yet most of us are willing to put that aside and be nice to our parents for a day.

And like the aforementioned made-up celebrations, Valentine’s Day is often thought of as a day for kids.  I remember writing out a dozen cards for a boy I liked in the fourth grade, signed your “secret admirer” of course, (then promptly realizing I couldn’t sign my own name to the cards for the rest of my class because my nine-year old future husband might be a handwriting detective and figure out my secret, I had to sign the rest as from “a friend”), homemade doily cards and mailboxes, and chocolate. What’s not to love?

But with adults, V-Day seems to bring a lot of pressure.  As a Single, I was expected to loathe the day and spend the day pining for my one true love.  Now that I’m in a relationship, I either have to LOVE LOVE LOVE the day and spend a bunch of money, or gripe and complain about how prices get jacked up, restaurants are over-crowded and about how Hallmark is ruining my life.

Can’t we just find some middle ground?

Instead, I am heading home to eat dinner with Ryan.  It will probably be like most other days, but today we’ll keep our computers off a little longer, maybe talk a bit more, and spend some time just hanging out with each other.  Like an unexpected snow-day, maybe we all just need a fake-holiday to slow us down and give us the chance to appreciate our lives.

 

Athletics, in profile

Posted on

“Most trainers are athletes but most clients aren’t” declares personal trainer Rhonda Major.

If all you knew of the profession came from reality TV shows like The Biggest Loser, you’d expect Major to weigh 95lbs and to shout a lot. You might also expect Major to follow up that simple, yet eye-opening statement with a diatribe about converting people into jocks. But she’s not your typical trainer.

Major, 33, is short with healthy curves. She’s warm, sometimes giddy, and talks with her hands constantly. Sitting cross-legged on the couch, her enormous brown eyes partially covered with the brim of a casual cap, Major is telling me how she got to this point: The first anniversary of her business, YouDefined. In addition to personal training, Major offers nutrition and life skills coaching. Her philosophy is about changing a way of a life improving overall mental and physical health, not crash diets or extreme workouts.

And Major knows whereof she speaks. Until ten years ago, Major led a mostly inactive life. Her formerly sedentary lifestyle helps her to understand the challenges one needs to overcome to live a healthier life and the necessary steps to get there.

The first step for Major was embarking on the first of many life changing journeys.

After university, she travelled to Australia in search of adventure and spent her first months in the outback village of Croydon – current population 255. It was there that she began to understand the way she treated her body was affecting her happiness. She began a regimen of walking at first, and cutting out beer and pasta. Later she developed interests in kayaking and hiking: “I didn’t know what I was doing. I just experimented.”

When she returned to Canada, she became a certified Life Coach and began a job working with troubled youth. But the experience was frustrating because the youth centre’s focus was only on emotional problems, not lifestyle choices that may have been contributing to them.

“Junk food kills brain cells,” she says passionately. “But I wasn’t allowed to talk about their eating habits or exercise.”

In her off time she became more active than ever. She began to run, cycle, and belly dance. She also started to “eat clean” – checking labels and avoiding processed foods as much as possible.

With her new love of exercise, she became a certified personal trainer – with no intention of becoming the kind of trainer she had worked with in the past or those who model themselves after TV stars.

“People don’t understand that seriously overweight people have actually changed their physiology. They need to re-train their bodies. Putting weight on takes a long time, so taking it off safely will take a long time too.”

She describes her training approach as “slow and steady wins the race.” She meets with personal training clients once a week at their homes or offices for an intense workout including cardio, resistance training, and, her specialty, core strengthening.

Major understands that long-term weight loss success only comes with a change in thinking and behaviour: “To train someone successfully you need to understand how to motivate them. . . . you need to figure out how to get inside clients’ heads.”

She also ensures each client is the right fit for her methods. Before beginning a training program, Major meets with prospective clients to discuss their expectations. Though many are nervous at first – everyone’s afraid of something, Major says – she’ll only work with clients who commit to changing their lives.

After ten years of seeking out challenges and excitement, she’s found stability: “What was really important to me was being my own boss and doing a job with integrity. I’ve got that now.”

New Post on Sweetspot.ca

Posted on

Check out this week’s post: Laws of the Land - the rules your babysitter wants you to know about.

The Yukon Quest

Posted on

Today, in balmy -17 degree weather, 24 mushers started the 1000 mile trip to Fairbanks, Alaska by sled.

The start line, which alternates between Whitehorse and Fairbanks, was packed with hundreds of people cheering the mushers and dogs on their way.

Ladies and gentlemen: The Yukon Quest dogs of 2011

Yukon Quest lizzbryce.com

Yukon Quest lizzbryce.com

Yukon Quest lizzbryce.com

Yukon Quest lizzbryce.comYukon Quest lizzbryce.comYukon Quest lizzbryce.comYukon Quest lizzbryce.comYukon Quest lizzbryce.com

Guest Blogger on Sweetspot.ca

Posted on

Hello world!

I’m the guest blogger on Sweetspot.ca’s “Sweetmama” site for the month of February.  I’ll be enlightening you all with my deep, dark babysitter secrets (that’s partially a lie).

Check out my first post: How to Keep Your Babysitter Happy

There are three more where that came from! Enjoy.Sweetmama logo

Dead parents and the kids they leave behind

Posted on

Here’s the thing about the People With Dead Parents club: If you’re not part of it, you don’t get it and you don’t get to speculate on it.

OpenFileTo ran an op-ed this weekend about Ryan Russell, the Toronto police officer tragically killed 2 weeks ago called No More Heroes.  It was similar to John Lorinc’s piece on Spacing from a few days before — a piece to counter the overwhelming mainstream media reaction to the death. But I have to admit I didn’t really read the entirety of the Heroes piece.  I got stuck on this line:

It’s true, those pictures of Russell’s two-year-old son, Nolan, are arresting. But how is anyone helped by focusing in pornographic detail on the tragedy of a boy so young he’ll soon forget knowing the father he lost?

What really struck me was the last part: “a boy so young he’ll soon forget knowing the father he lost.” I lost all interest in the argument at hand and only thought of that line.

I have no doubt that the line was written with the best intentions, maybe even compassion.  From the outside, it seems like it may even be a blessing for that child to be so young.  He won’t have a father, but at least he doesn’t really understand what’s going on right now.

But it’s so much worse than that.  On top of  losing a father,  his tragedy is that he won’t remember his father and people will remind him of that for his entire life.

I can’t tell you how I reacted when my mum died just after my third birthday.  I don’t remember feeling traumatized. I have no idea if I even knew what was going on.  But I can tell you that I’ve felt a void my entire life.  People have always said to me “It’s so sad you were so young. You probably don’t even remember your mother.” And all I can say is “you’re right”.  Because I don’t remember my mother.

All I know of her has been told through other people.  I’ve never been sure if what I know of myself has anything to do with her.  Am I like her? Would I have turned out differently is she were alive? Would I like that person?

I’ve always felt like I missed something, but I’ve never been able to put my finger on it.  How could I?  I don’t remember.

I have a teddy bear that my mother arranged for me to have the Christmas after she died.  I hold on to it.  I protect it.

The memories I do have – all three of them – are only snapshots.  Two are of her death, and the other may really just be a memory of a photograph.  When I was visiting my dad in the fall, he, my brother and I went to visit her grave. At some point I shared my memories and for a second my dad didn’t know what I was talking about. In that moment my heart raced, I felt sick. If this memory isn’t real, then I have nothing.

We sorted it out.  It probably was real.  And so I will continue to hold on to those 3 thoughts, and my old, matted brown bear because that’s what I’ve got.

As for Nolan Russell, Mike Smith is right.  Let’s not take on his tragedy as if it were our own. But let’s not dismiss it either.  He’s two years old, but his life is forever changed.  Now he is part of the club.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 369 other followers